Monthly Archives: March 2009

First, as mentioned lower down in this blog, John Ashton, senior adviser on climate change to Foreign Secretary David Miliband, has written what’s in my view one of the most powerful current messages on the urgency of a radical political awakening on the environment, and on the importance of science stating its message much more clearly. On Surviving the Collision. It’s short, cogent, and WELL worth reading in full.

First, as mentioned lower down in this blog, John Ashton, senior adviser on climate change to Foreign Secretary David Miliband, has written what’s in my view one of the most powerful current messages on the urgency of a radical political awakening on the environment, and on the importance of science stating its message much more clearly. On Surviving the Collision. It’s short, cogent, and WELL worth reading in full.

Just back from seeing The Age of Stupid, a new UK-produced film looking back from an imagined hot world in 2055 from on mankind’s failure to take the steps that would have saved our homo sapiens from catastrophe.

ssil-fuelled comfort the reality of how we stand on the brink of the precipice.

Humankind with our current level of political and economic courage is like that addict, believing that we can keep using/abusing and somehow change at the same time. We can’t, and only very tough love will wake us up. The difference with the therapy analogy here being that it isn’t just the client who’s killing him/herself. Our own survival is also literally dependent on our clients’ ability to change. We are in this together, and don’t have the luxury of endless, slow-moving therapeutic work that gets there in the end.

Nick Totton asked the critical question in answer to my last blog, HOW should we begin preparing for the very worst.

The answer to that question is not at all clear to me either.

I am sure that Transition Towns, energy-saving, the work being done in spiritual communities and all the rest of which you all know so much more than me, and in which you have been engaged for aeons, is valuable, essential, and part of that preparation.

My concern is that the possibility/probability of potentially catastrophic breakdown, and how we approach that, needs to be made much more central and explicit.

As is done, evidently, in new movie The Age of Stupid. And as is terrifyingly NOT done in 99% of current media, political, cultural, economic discourse. Despite my hopes last weekend that we were possibly at last seeing a tipping point in how this is being understood and discussed. Another false dawn, though it’s just a question of time.

Once many more people begin engaging with/taking on board just what a challenge this is, I am confident that all kinds of options, approaches, possibly even (though I am not optimistic here) solutions will begin to emerge.

However, as long as we focus almost entirely on the likelihood/option of stopping climate change before it’s too late (and of course, it’s about so much more than CO2), we will never generate sufficient drive behind the need to change profoundly and rapidly. That was my personal disappointment with the Stern report and indeed with the IPCC conclusions of 2007 – mealy-mouthed, optimistic, lowest-common-denominator. And which is why the Copenhagen discussions last week were so very important – naming it more clearly than ever how it really is.

Two analogies. One our old friend the Titanic. The other picking up on therapy.

Let’s imagine we are indeed on the Titanic, steaming – indeed picking up speed – towards the scientifically-predicted collision with the iceberg. The chances of finding ourselves dying in the water are, let’s say, 98%. What do we, as passengers and crew, do?

• First, we seriously appraise the risk. And make sure everyone on board understands that this involves them too.
• Then, we bring together the best minds and souls on board to look at how we might avert the collision. Slowing down, changing course, all options. But that can be only a part of our work.
• At the same time, we have to prepare the ship as best we can for the actual collision. Reinforcing bulkheads, moving equipment and supplies to safer places, ensuring energy supplies for whatever and whoever survives the impact.
• Parallel to that, we appraise realistically what supplies we have on board, the state of the lifeboats, and how best to use them. Both now before we hit the iceberg, and on behalf of any likely survivors.
• This bit is really difficult – we have to start thinking about who is going to be on the lifeboats, and how to handle panic. We have to name the fact (as some are now beginning to do) that many, many will die. And that terrible choices will have to be made.
• We must do whatever we can to ensure that there ARE survivors of the impact itself and its immediate aftermath, who then carry with them what they need to keep surviving. We need to consider how any survivors of the likely collision are going to live in the world they reach beyond the immediate catastrophe. That will have to be very differently to how we/they have partied on the boat so far. Transition movements, meditation, discussions, realtionships, spiritual preparation, consideration and preparation of sustainable technologies and supplies and the rest. Absolutely essential, and all work done now can only benefit that future community.

In short, there’s a huge amount to be done – practically, emotionally, spiritually, politically. But, and here’s my second analogy, none of it will have the impact it needs to have if most of the planet doesn’t realise how urgent this task of preparation is, and somehow thinks it can continue with business-as-usual, with just a bit of tweaking.

• I don’t know about others in this conversation, but as therapist, I know that I cannot begin serious work with an addict until they have acknowledged what a mess they are in, and in AA terms climbed on the wagon. If the client continues to use drugs or get paralytic six nights a week, I can sit (and occasionally have sat) with them until blue in the face. And the therapy won’t work, full stop. As addict after addict has told me, until the wheels came off the wagon, they weren’t ready to change. THEN, we need to be here, and to help them pick up the pieces in a new way. So we have to sit with them, and keep talking and listening, until they’re ready to shift.

Your question How? is critically fair, Nick. What I do know is that I personally don’t believe I will serve anything or anyone by beating around what I see as a very clear bush. It’s damned uncomfortable, but I don’t see that any other approach than the bluntest of talking – let’s hope it comes very soon from our political leaders – will help.

The iceberg looms.

A couple of thoughts from Eeyore’s gloomy corner of the Gaian wood about guilt and shame and travelling by car or plane to an ecotherapy retreat weekend in July.

Reflecting the theme of signposting on the left (cycling in Bavaria last spring), it’s time, I think, to move this blog to a more appropriate address, namely www.facingclimatechange.blogspot.com.

I’m leaving all the climate change comments on this site for the time being, but preparing for this to be, as originally intended, a space for things more immediately personal, family and above all cycling!

So, as I was saying, please go to www.facingclimatechange.blogspot.com and if necessary (not sure if these follower settings were also imported) sign up anew. And above all, let me know if there are any glitches. As there always are.

This blog template isn’t yet the most perfect – we’re beginning to write serious quantities of important thought, and it all tangles up, like the splendid and rich roots on the left, in a lot of text on the front page. But bear with us/me, as we experiment with new ways of posting an intro, with a link to more. Which, in this case, is my thoughts in response Mary-Jayne and Viola.